Image credit: Cécile Graat |
Last weekend, I watched the movie Frozen with my family to see what all the hype surrounding the film
was about. Personally, I thought it was pretty good, but it didn’t live up to
all the attention it’s been getting. I couldn’t help drawing comparisons to the
movie Tangled, which I think is better
overall. They’re both Disney CGI films with musical elements and goofy leading
ladies. True, “Let It Go” from Frozen is
a killer song, but as far as story and characters go, Tangled seems more solid.
There’s one particular scene in Tangled that I really love [spoiler alert]. At the climax,
Rapunzel’s evil kidnapper, Mother Gothel, inflicts a mortal wound on Flynn
Ryder, the love interest, and Rapunzel begs Gothel to allow her to use her
magical hair to heal Flynn. As Rapunzel hovers over Flynn, preparing to sing
her song that magically heals wounds, Flynn leans towards her as if to kiss
her, but instead cuts off her hair, thereby removing her ability to save him
but also ensuring that Mother Gothel no longer has any use for her. It’s a
beautiful, touching moment of true love, and I especially love it because Flynn
was portrayed throughout the movie as a rogue, but he turns out to be a nice
guy.
As much as I love that part of the movie, there’s one aspect
of the scene that bothers me. After Flynn dies, Rapunzel sings and brings him
back to life. This bugs me for three reasons. First off, the movie had already
established that the magical properties of Rapunzel’s hair disappeared from
hairs that were cut, thus establishing the need for her long hair. Second, no
part of the movie even hinted that her healing abilities extended to resurrecting
the dead [end of spoiler alert]. Third, and most importantly, I’m bothered that
the ending featured a magical solution that made everything all better. That’s
become a pet peeve of mine with movies. I’ve seen too many films in which no
matter what happens, everything is perfect in the end. The main characters, the
“good guys,” are able to get everything they want.
Contrast this with a book I’ve read recently. I’ve been on a
Jannette Rallison kick, and one of her books, Just One Wish, is about a teenager who tries to help her
cancer-stricken six-year-old brother survive his battle with the disease [here
comes another spoiler alert]. To save her brother, Annika travels to Hollywood
to convince his favorite actor to visit him (how that will help him survive
cancer makes more sense if you read the book). However, even though she’s
successful in bringing back the TV star (who just happens to have a square jaw
and broad shoulders, which are apparently the two most attractive traits a guy
can have), a surgery to remove the tumor in the brother’s brain fails. Despite
her efforts, he’s going to die.
It’s a sad ending, but it’s made beautiful by the way the
brother is able to face his death with courage, grace, and peace [end of
spoiler alert]. I love endings like this because even though not everything is
perfect, the characters make peace with their problems.
Perhaps it’s just me, but I feel like it’s become a bit
inappropriate in our culture to talk about human limitations. I always hear “inspiring”
quotes about limitless potential, and the idea that if humans can pursue a task
with determination and hard work, they can accomplish it. Anyone who says
something is impossible or says that people do have limits is regarded as a
pessimist.
Here’s the truth: humans have limits, we can’t do everything
we want, and we don’t have control over everything.
Take Just One Wish
for example [spoiler alert, again]. Did Annika try her very hardest to save her
brother? Did she want him to survive, and did she believe that she could help
him? Absolutely. But it the end, despite all her efforts, he died [end of
spoiler alert]. I’ll use myself as an example next. A few years ago, I wanted
something more than anything I had ever wanted before in my life. I had faith
that I could get it, and I tried my very hardest, and it ended up not working
out. For years, I’ve been trying to figure out what I did wrong, what I should
have done differently, and what’s so wrong with me that I couldn’t follow this
pattern of getting what I wanted if I worked hard for it. I’m only now coming
to the conclusion that there wasn’t anything I could have done. I did my best,
and it simply didn’t work out.
That’s what bothers me about the ending of Tangled and many other movies. I don’t
want to give people, and especially children, the idea that everything works
out the way you want it to. I understand why we love that message, and I
understand that we should be optimistic and try to push our limits, but I think
that any optimism should be grounded in reality.
In the words of the Rolling Stones, “you can’t always get
what you want.”
Honestly, I think it’s unhealthy to perpetuate the myth that
anything is possible. One logical conclusion of that myth is that it’s possible
to go through this life without anything bad happening to you. I know that for
myself, whenever something bad happens to me or someone I care about, I can’t
help but wonder what I could have done to prevent the misfortune. Sometimes it’s
okay to think like that because whatever happened really was my fault, but in
so many instances, there was nothing I could have done. The fact is that no
matter how hard you try, bad things will happen.
I think of the Serenity Prayer:
God,
grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change,
The
courage to change the things I can,
And
wisdom to know the difference.
Can you imagine how much serenity we would feel if we were
blessed in that manner? That’s a beautiful sentiment.
I also worry that the “anything is possible” myth also leads
to victim blaming. Take poor people, for example. I’ve heard many times that
the poor are poor because they’re lazy, unmotivated, and waste their money on
drugs. Here’s the truth: most poor people are poor because they’re born poor.
Likewise, most rich people are rich because they’re born rich. Here in America,
we love to hear about rags-to-riches stories, but both rags-to-rags and
riches-to-riches stories are much more common.
I do understand the reasoning behind these “inspirational”
quotes about “anything is possible.” It’s great to have hope, to believe in
things, and to push the boundaries of the possible. But as I said before, I
really think our optimism should be grounded in the reality of limitations.
It’s weird to get inspiration from the Rolling Stones, but I
wanted to extend the quote from before. “You can’t always get what you want.
But if you try sometime, you just might find you get what you need.”
They should have had a bit of foreshadowing about her *tears* having healing powers. 'Cause I'm pretty certain he was only *mostly* dead. Rereading The Thief, I notice that it has some pretty interesting foreshadowing....
ReplyDeleteBut anyway, I can't believe you didn't mention the Alcatraz discussion of this subject. You know, with popsicles.